The Best Free Evolution Strategies To Transform Your Life
What is Free Evolution?
Free evolution is the idea that the natural processes of living organisms can cause them to develop over time. This includes the evolution of new species as well as the change in appearance of existing ones.
Numerous examples have been offered of this, including different varieties of stickleback fish that can live in either fresh or salt water and walking stick insect varieties that favor specific host plants. These typically reversible traits are not able to explain fundamental changes to basic body plans.
Evolution through Natural Selection
Scientists have been fascinated by the development of all living creatures that live on our planet for many centuries. Charles Darwin's natural selection theory is the best-established explanation. This is because those who are better adapted are able to reproduce faster and longer than those who are less well-adapted. As time passes, the number of well-adapted individuals grows and eventually creates a new species.
Natural selection is an ongoing process and involves the interaction of 3 factors that are: reproduction, variation and inheritance. Variation is caused by mutations and sexual reproduction both of which increase the genetic diversity of a species. Inheritance is the term used to describe the transmission of a person’s genetic characteristics, which includes both dominant and recessive genes and their offspring. Reproduction is the process of producing viable, fertile offspring, which includes both asexual and sexual methods.
All of these elements must be in balance for natural selection to occur. If, for instance an allele of a dominant gene causes an organism reproduce and live longer than the recessive gene The dominant allele will become more prevalent in a group. However, if the allele confers a disadvantage in survival or reduces fertility, it will disappear from the population. The process is self-reinforcing, meaning that a species with a beneficial characteristic can reproduce and survive longer than an individual with a maladaptive trait. The more fit an organism is, measured by its ability reproduce and survive, is the more offspring it can produce. Individuals with favorable characteristics, such as a long neck in Giraffes, or the bright white color patterns on male peacocks are more likely than others to reproduce and survive which eventually leads to them becoming the majority.
Natural selection is only a force for populations, not on individual organisms. This is a major distinction from the Lamarckian evolution theory which holds that animals acquire traits either through use or lack of use. If a giraffe extends its neck to catch prey and the neck grows larger, then its offspring will inherit this characteristic. The differences in neck length between generations will persist until the neck of the giraffe becomes too long to not breed with other giraffes.
Evolution by Genetic Drift
Genetic drift occurs when alleles from a gene are randomly distributed in a group. At some point, one will attain fixation (become so common that it can no longer be eliminated through natural selection) and other alleles fall to lower frequency. In the extreme it can lead to a single allele dominance. The other alleles are essentially eliminated, and heterozygosity decreases to zero. In a small group, this could lead to the total elimination of recessive alleles. This scenario is called a bottleneck effect, and it is typical of the kind of evolutionary process that occurs when a large number of individuals move to form a new population.
A phenotypic bottleneck could happen when the survivors of a catastrophe such as an epidemic or a mass hunt, are confined in a limited area. The surviving individuals will be largely homozygous for the dominant allele, meaning that they all have the same phenotype, and thus share the same fitness characteristics. This could be caused by war, earthquakes or even a plague. Whatever the reason the genetically distinct population that remains could be susceptible to genetic drift.
Walsh Lewens, Walsh, and Ariew define drift as a departure from the expected value due to differences in fitness. They provide a well-known example of twins that are genetically identical and have identical phenotypes, but one is struck by lightning and dies, whereas the other lives and reproduces.
This type of drift can play a significant part in the evolution of an organism. But, it's not the only way to develop. Natural selection is the most common alternative, in which mutations and migration keep the phenotypic diversity of the population.
Stephens claims that there is a huge distinction between treating drift as an agent or cause and treating other causes such as selection mutation and migration as forces and causes. Stephens claims that a causal process explanation of drift lets us differentiate it from other forces, and this distinction is essential. He further argues that drift is both direction, i.e., it tends to eliminate heterozygosity. It also has a size, which is determined based on population size.
Evolution by Lamarckism
Students of biology in high school are often exposed to Jean-Baptiste lamarck's (1744-1829) work. His theory of evolution is generally called "Lamarckism" and it asserts that simple organisms evolve into more complex organisms through the inheritance of characteristics that result from the natural activities of an organism use and misuse. Lamarckism can be demonstrated by the giraffe's neck being extended to reach higher levels of leaves in the trees. This process would result in giraffes passing on their longer necks to their offspring, who then get taller.

Lamarck was a French Zoologist. In his inaugural lecture for his course on invertebrate zoology held at the Museum of Natural History in Paris on the 17th May 1802, he presented an innovative concept that completely challenged previous thinking about organic transformation. According to 무료에볼루션 , living creatures evolved from inanimate material through a series of gradual steps. Lamarck wasn't the only one to suggest this but he was considered to be the first to provide the subject a thorough and general explanation.
The dominant story is that Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection and Lamarckism were competing during the 19th century. Darwinism ultimately prevailed which led to what biologists call the Modern Synthesis. The theory argues that acquired traits can be passed down and instead argues that organisms evolve through the influence of environment elements, like Natural Selection.
While Lamarck believed in the concept of inheritance by acquired characters, and his contemporaries also spoke of this idea but it was not a central element in any of their evolutionary theorizing. This is partly because it was never tested scientifically.
It has been more than 200 years since the birth of Lamarck, and in the age genomics, there is an increasing body of evidence that supports the heritability acquired characteristics. This is referred to as "neo Lamarckism", or more commonly epigenetic inheritance. This is a variant that is as valid as the popular neodarwinian model.
Evolution through adaptation
One of the most common misconceptions about evolution is that it is a result of a kind of struggle to survive. In reality, this notion is a misrepresentation of natural selection and ignores the other forces that are driving evolution. The struggle for survival is more accurately described as a struggle to survive in a specific environment, which could involve not only other organisms but also the physical environment itself.
Understanding adaptation is important to understand evolution. It refers to a specific characteristic that allows an organism to survive and reproduce within its environment. It could be a physiological structure such as fur or feathers, or a behavioral trait like moving into the shade in hot weather or stepping out at night to avoid the cold.
The capacity of an organism to extract energy from its environment and interact with other organisms and their physical environment, is crucial to its survival. The organism must have the right genes to produce offspring, and be able to find sufficient food and resources. In addition, the organism should be capable of reproducing at an optimal rate within its niche.
These factors, together with gene flow and mutations can result in changes in the proportion of different alleles in a population’s gene pool. As time passes, this shift in allele frequencies can result in the emergence of new traits, and eventually new species.
Many of the characteristics we admire about animals and plants are adaptations, such as the lungs or gills that extract oxygen from the air, fur or feathers to protect themselves, long legs for running away from predators, and camouflage to hide. To understand the concept of adaptation it is crucial to differentiate between physiological and behavioral characteristics.
Physical characteristics like thick fur and gills are physical characteristics. Behavioral adaptations are not, such as the tendency of animals to seek out companionship or to retreat into the shade during hot weather. Additionally it is important to note that a lack of forethought does not make something an adaptation. In fact, failing to consider the consequences of a decision can render it unadaptive, despite the fact that it appears to be logical or even necessary.